There is no evidence at all that Paul meant anything other than languages--at a minimum he knew Hebrew, Greek, Aramaic, Latin. In the research I have done, I have never found a secular passage (certainly not a bible passage) where he Greek word glossa, used here, meant unarguably anything other than known languages.
I challenge you to find a secular Greek source or author where glossa means some kind of ecstatic prayer language--perhaps in the Greek mystery religions?
Is the pendulum swinging in a different direction?
Discussion in 'General Baptist Discussions' started by righteousdude2, Aug 14, 2017.
?
Do you have a private, prayer language?
Poll closed Aug 14, 2019.
-
Yes ...
3 vote(s)17.6% -
No ...
14 vote(s)82.4% -
I do have a prayer language, but fear the wrath of others, so I keep it to myself!
0 vote(s)0.0%
Page 5 of 9
-
John of Japan Well-Known MemberSite Supporter
-
John of Japan Well-Known MemberSite Supporter
-
"because I do believe there are varying interpretations, I believe it is okay to believe one way or the other," said Page."
Fortunately Frank Page says you don't get to decide who is and who is not a Baptist, well a Southern Baptist anyway. -
-
John of Japan Well-Known MemberSite Supporter
-
-
John of Japan Well-Known MemberSite Supporter
A Greek scholar friend of mine just shot me a note about Chrysostom's (347-407) comments on 1 Cor. 12-14. He plainly stated that it was difficult to teach on tongues since that ended long ago.
So, in the 2-5th centuries there were no tongues speaking churches. Either the early Christians knew better than the modern Pentecostals and Charismatics, or somehow the Church has been messed up for 19 centuries, missing out on tongues.
If anyone doubts what I'm saying, here's a great article on it: A Critical Look at Tongues and Montanism. The author makes the great point that Eusebius does not use the term glossa, which is the term used in the Bible. So very obviously--to me--the babblings of the Montanists was not like modern tongues, but just speaking stupid things. -
John of Japan Well-Known MemberSite Supporter
-
-
-
Not only were they attacked by the tongues speakers, one of the pastor/teachers at one of the bible institutes was beaten so badly he will never fully recover and at least two of the church buildings were burned down.
We don't often see it in this country, but once a person opens their heart to such error, and starts to think "I have something they don't have" - which eventually morphs into "Because I have something they don't have I am superior to them" which then leads to "Because I am superior to them they are inferior to me and therefore must be blaspheming the Holy Spirit so I have the right to attack them." And the next thing we see is churches burned down, pastors beaten, and sooner or later, killed.
And they call themselves "Christians." Which means "Christ-like." :( -
John of Japan Well-Known MemberSite Supporter
-
His main problem is a lack of specificity. He talks about the Holy Spirit empowering the believer for life and service, but fails to specify what he means by "empowering." Empowering like the indwelling/leading of the HS, which we all believe, or does he mean the babbling and excesses we see in Pentecostalism and the Charismatic movement. :( -
John of Japan Well-Known MemberSite Supporter
I have a little book, I Once Spoke in Tongues, by ex-Pentecostal preacher Wayne Robinson. He tells the story who was pastoring a church of 600 members. Only 150 spoke in tongues, so he split the church and started a new one with them. "When the group leader queried him about his responsibility to the rest of the church, he answered that he was sorry, but they were resisting the work of the Holy Spirit" (p. 71). -
John of Japan Well-Known MemberSite Supporter
-
The canon is a reach at best. -
-
Jesus is nowhere to be found in the context. Nowhere. Never mentioned.
Remember the three rules for understanding the bible.
1. Context
2. Context
3. Context
Oh, and did I mention "context?"
You can't just suck this stuff out of your thumb. :) -
-
We have a way for missionaries to reach the unreached in their own language. It is called "Language School." Ask John about it.
Page 5 of 9