Flowers are a living thing. Can it be sinful to pick them?
Given the time I take to tend my prized roses, yes, it would be a sin for anyone to pick them except for me.
Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
Flowers are a living thing. Can it be sinful to pick them?
Like I thought...you are only interested in trolling. All bark and no bite.
I will give you that, I read it real quick while responding. You are still a troll.
What does this have to do with the discussion? I'm sure flowers were picked in the Garden of Eden, and we know plants were eaten. They have no blood, hence no "life" in the sense an animal or human does.Flowers are a living thing. Can it be sinful to pick them?
I see nothing but a bunch of people raised on hunting for "sport" trying to defend their practice. Maybe I'll go down to the local Planned Parenthood and ask their advice on whether abortion is wrong as well.I think it's funny that several people in this thread have had the same problem with your arguments and have posted similar rebuttals and yet, you have absolutely no clue that the problem could be with you.
Everybody else is wrong but you.
This personal attack supports my allegation to the T. Thanks. You are aware that is in violation of the BB, don't you?And you're still an idiot, so I guess we're even.
I see nothing but a bunch of people raised on hunting for "sport" trying to defend their practice. Maybe I'll go down to the local Planned Parenthood and ask their advice on whether abortion is wrong as well.
I'm hardly talking like PETA. I'm against killing an animal for recreation, not killing an animal...huge difference (something the Tractor Man can't understand).See... now you are talking like PETA.. .
Please don't go that route.. you know that God values a HUMAN life more than an animals life... I posted that scripture...
Don't devalue the pro-life stance by equating babies with animals...
What does this have to do with the discussion? I'm sure flowers were picked in the Garden of Eden, and we know plants were eaten. They have no blood, hence no "life" in the sense an animal or human does.
This personal attack supports my allegation to the T. Thanks. You are aware that is in violation of the BB, don't you?
I see nothing but a bunch of people raised on hunting for "sport" trying to defend their practice. Maybe I'll go down to the local Planned Parenthood and ask their advice on whether abortion is wrong as well.
I've done no such thing.You seem to be equating animals with humans
Flowers are a living thing. Can it be sinful to pick them?
It would help at this point to put the keyboard down and back away from the computer and I should take your advice. What part of KILLING AN ANIMAL FOR RECREATION (not for food) DON'T YOU UNDERSTAND?Really? You mean that you're really so morally confused that you don't understand the difference between gathering animals for food and killing a little baby?
I think I'm coming to the "don't answer a fool according to his folly" part of the thread.
It would help at this point to put the keyboard down and back away from the computer and I should take your advice. What part of KILLING AN ANIMAL FOR RECREATION (not for food) DON'T YOU UNDERSTAND?
I didn't report you for anything (I know your reading comprehension is a little rusty), I just wanted to bring it to your attention, not that it helps.OK. You report me for calling you a name and I'll report you for calling me a name.
Or you could just grow up.
Most of it, as it is a copout. You can enjoy providing for your family if needed, you can enjoy the outdoors, you can enjoy spending time with family and friends, but to enjoy killing an animal, the hunt, is what has been stated on this very thread as the "thrill". It's the "thrill" of getting the buck in your crosshair and pulling the trigger. This was stated on this very thread.What part of JUST BECAUSE SOMEBODY ENJOYS HUNTING DOESN'T MEAN THEY KILL FOR PLEASURE don't you understand?
Question for the hunters...would the entire experience be different if you traded your bow or rifle for a Nikon, why or why not?
Yes. That would be called photography. I have hundreds of wildlife pictures I've taken from the same treestand I use to hunt. My camera is a Canon but the scope on my Savage 7mm-08 is a Nikon.
Maybe I'm hanging around with the wrong guys but I really don't know anyone who hunts to satiate a blood lust.
There's a hundred emotions running through your mind when you aim your bow or gun at a deer. They are majestic creatures and the taking of their life is not something done haphazardly. You just don't start blasting away at it hoping you punch enough holes in it so it will die. I wounded and lost a deer several years ago. I spent over a day and a half looking for it. You cannot begin to imagine the sick, hollow feeling that puts in your gut. I'm sure there are so-called hunters who wouldn't even bother to look for a blood trail. I'm not one of those and neither is my hunting partner.
We do derive great pleasure from our marksmanship, woodsmanship and the whole deer camp experience. We hunt in the deer's natural environment. They live in the woods in all weather conditions. The advantage is to the deer. It takes a collection of various skills to put yourself in the place where you have a chance to harvest a deer. The enjoyment of hunting takes all those factors into consideration. I cannot divorce one facet of hunting and call it immoral.
I have the rack from 9-pointer mounted and hanging on the wall at camp. Nothing was wasted. The meat went in the freezer. The hide was donated to a local veteran's group. The feet were made into a gun rack. The antlers hang on the wall as a reminder of days well spent with my best friend in a 12x15 cabin in the woods.