God created the earth and all therein in 6 days. I bet that was against the laws of biology too.
The animal was recorded. It was recorded five times in four verses in the KJV.
Job 41 & 39 Dinosaurs
Discussion in 'Other Christian Denominations' started by TaliOrlando, Sep 7, 2007.
Page 3 of 4
-
-
So if the fire's real, are the lamps flying from his mouth real too?
Ya think there might be some poetic license used here???!!!
Rob -
The word "neesings" is a word meaning "sneezing".
-
ByGracethroughFaith said:You believe it's a dragon that breathes fire. Yet a fire-breathing animal has never been found, in fact actual fire originating in any living organism defies all laws of biology.Click to expand...
in Christ,
Bob -
standingfirminChrist said:God created the earth and all therein in 6 days. I bet that was against the laws of biology too.
The animal was recorded. It was recorded five times in four verses in the KJV.Click to expand...
God created the laws of biology.
'An' animal was described, you just happen to believe it was a dragon, I happen to believe it was a crocodile. If the animal described was not in existence in Job's time and at the time Job was written, as well as in the present day, it does not serve the purpose to strike awe in the the hearts of men.
To look for a mythological dragon in the Bible, one is turning from truth to mythology.
BGTF -
Until the mid 1800's the discussion of Job 40, centered around whether the behemoth was an elephant or a hippopotamus. Likewise the discussion of Job 41 was about whether the leviathan was a whale or a crocodile. Thanks to Mr. Darwin, it is only in the last century and a half that people have even considered anything else.
My conclusion is that whether they be dinosaurs or dragons or whatever, there is MUCH more reason to doubt the new suppositions than there is to believe them.
BGTF -
Thanks for bringing awesome points. I have a question thought, What are the Dinosaur Bones that Scientist show to prove they existed? God Bless!!
There are many possible explanations, but instead of leaning towards the fabrication end of things, I believe the bones are the remnants of the animals killed in the flood. Along with those animals there would have been many sea creatures who would have been beached at the same time.Click to expand...
The fact that certain "scientific" procedures have been used to "date" these fossils, producing absurd and untestable results which happen to conflict with Scripture, means that one should reject these unscientific dating methods. Not the existence of the creatures whose fossils they are trying to date.
Whether or not behemoth is a dinosaur (though it is :) ), one cannot argue from silence: There is no Scriptural evidence for the existence of my computer. Are computers the product of a vast conspiracy theory? -
Ok... i have thought on this... (watch out.. my brain is breathing smoke!)Click to expand...
-
I am flabbergasted that I am watching someone who believes in fire-breathing dragons arguing with someone who doesn't believe in dinosaurs! I have no dog in that fight, but it is amusing to watch. And of course, both believe they are biblically correct and the other wrong. :laugh:
Let me know when you get to trolls and leprechauns. I can't wait. -
Magnetic Poles said:I am flabbergasted that I am watching someone who believes in fire-breathing dragons arguing with someone who doesn't believe in dinosaurs! I have no dog in that fight, but it is amusing to watch. And of course, both believe they are biblically correct and the other wrong. :laugh:
Let me know when you get to trolls and leprechauns. I can't wait.Click to expand...
BGTF -
webdog said:Now we know...Leviathin is Tiny Tim :laugh:Click to expand...
-
Magnetic Poles said:Fresh water fish cannot live in salt water.Click to expand...
-
Magnetic Poles said:I am flabbergasted that I am watching someone who believes in fire-breathing dragons arguing with someone who doesn't believe in dinosaurs! I have no dog in that fight, but it is amusing to watch. And of course, both believe they are biblically correct and the other wrong. :laugh:
Let me know when you get to trolls and leprechauns. I can't wait.Click to expand... -
standingfirminChrist said:I believe the leviathan to be some kind of dragon.
The Strongs defines the 'livyathan' as a sea monster or dragon of sorts.
We do know his skin is said by Scripture to be inpenetrable, which also would rule the crocodile out.
I believe it is a fire breathing dragon as I stated earlier in the thread.
Now, the question is... is this leviathan extinct now? or is it possible that it is still out in the sea somewhere?
I have heard some say it is the Loch Ness monster, but I cannot agree. The leviathan's home is the sea, not a lake.Click to expand... -
ByGracethroughFaith said:Yes, strange as it may seem, you are understanding me correctly. I don't believe dinosaurs ever existed.
BGTFClick to expand...
you're saying "no" to quite a bit of empirical evidence there... -
ByGracethroughFaith said:This is a Baptist site, I don't believe betting is tolerated. Either way, I am not a partaker of bets myself.....
God created the laws of biology.
'An' animal was described, you just happen to believe it was a dragon, I happen to believe it was a crocodile. If the animal described was not in existence in Job's time and at the time Job was written, as well as in the present day, it does not serve the purpose to strike awe in the the hearts of men.
To look for a mythological dragon in the Bible, one is turning from truth to mythology.
BGTFClick to expand... -
I am just curious, BGTF,
Since you believe the fire breathing dragon from Job to be mythology, do you believe the horses with the stings of scorpions in their tails from Revelation to be mythology as well? -
standingfirminChrist said:Since the Word of God declares the leviathan to be a dragon (Isaiah 27:1, and since the Word of God says leviathan breathes fire, I believe the leviathian to be a fire breathing dragon as the Word of God declares. The fire breathing Leviathan is not a mythological creature.Click to expand...
I respect your position on this matter, and see no reason to further 'entertain the masses' on this topic.
You are free to believe leviathan is a literal fire breathing dragon, and I am free not to.
In answer to your other question, I believe the horses with scorpions in their tails to be symbolic of something other than a literal animal.
Having finite understanding, I could be wrong on both accounts, but like I said, 'Here I stand...'
BGTF -
Since the Word of God declares the leviathan to be a real fire breathing dragon, would I not be teaching or preaching a lie to claim otherwise?
Since the horses in whose tails is the sting of scorpions are not said to be symbolic, would I not be teaching or preaching a lie to claim they are symbolic?
I must preach what the Word of God declares believing that the Word of God is true. -
just-want-peace Well-Known MemberSite SupporterI must preach what the Word of God declares believing that the Word of God is true.Click to expand...
I'm with you SFIC, 100 % on this one!!!
Page 3 of 4