Obama on abortion at Notre Dame U

There is no "common ground." It is a black and white issue - to kill or not to kill babies. Period.

 

You make one good point, but you are willing to meet Obama further than we ought to be, IMO.

I will agree to one point: we should take victories where we can get them (parental consent, for example)...just because that will save lives: not all of them, but some.

However, "stopping the reasons" will not stop abortion. People are not basically good. Abortions will happen--often--until they are legalized. There's no sense pretending that's not true.

 

obama is already a proven liar. I will repeat what others have said. There is no common ground for those who consider the life of the unborn and just born child precious and those who consider the unborn or just born child [per obama] as just a piece of garbage. Can you tell me what are "fair minded words" in discussing the slaughter of unborn children.

 

Now that is a great line! :thumbsup: :laugh:

Ed

 

Exactly, amen!

 

Thanks RBell but I can say it best this way, in the absence of absolute victory, some victory reigns supreme. Some of you remind me of a friend who is discouraged because he doesn't have a mega Church. I am grateful to have A Church.

There are two real ways to stop abortions, take away the reason for abortions and brining everyone in the world to Christ. Making them illegal will have about the same results as President Obama's proposals. It will only slow them down but it will in no way stop them. So that victory is also not a complete victory in the eyes of the unborn.

I will have to respectfully disagree with most of you, I believe one life saved is success. I see it like bringing folks to Christ, I may not be able to bring everyone in the world to Christ, but if I can bring just one I have done a good work.

 

All this black and white talk says it is really about your way or no way. This means it is not the unborn you are fighting for, you are fighting to get your way. If you were fighting for the unborn you would find saving one baby who might otherwise be lost to be a great success and super progress.

Because you have to ask about "fair minded words" in regards to the unborn really shows your objective is not about doing all you can on their behalf, it is about staying the course until you get things exactly your way despite the fact that babies are being aborted each and every day you hold out in stubborn protest.

I am really starting to question if you guys are interested in saving the unborn or just making abortions illegal??? Remember, the prisons are full of folks who did things that were illegal.

 

OldRegular asks a fair question.

What are "fair minded words" when it comes to the destruction of the innocent unborn?

 

It seems you conscience is bothering you and you need to hold on to such ideas in order to maintain your support for an abortion President.

 

"He urged supporters and opponents of abortion rights to "work together to reduce the number of women seeking abortions by reducing unintended pregnancies, and making adoption more available, and providing care and support for women who do carry their child to term."

Ok so what has Obama done to encourage or promote these three things - ever?

As President he has only provided more money for abortion.

Compare his words against his actions.

BTW - which of those three things are not already easily available?

 

LB, I am all for working with anyone who wants to decrease the number of abortions, esp. through making adoption easier. But Obama is not trustworthy on this, based on his prior actions and words. He is beholden to the abortion lobby - the Planned Parenthoods of the world. They do not want fewer abortions, because it hits them in the pocketbook. So no one really trusts him on this. But who knows - maybe he is telling the truth this time and is starting to change on this issue. His future actions will tell.

Lastly, even though I would gladly work with someone to reduce abortions, I would still like for them to answer my question above - Why do they want to reduce the number of abortions? Asking that question reveals the inconsistency in their thinking, and maybe it will make them rethink their position.

 

Baloney. There is no such thing as a half dead baby. There are babies who survive the abortionist's suction curette but even that wasn't good enough for the murderer-in-chief who voted to let survivors suffer and die on dirty laundry heaps. Your premise is completely faulty, grasping at straws, seeking for any straw to soothe your seared conscience. It is a black and white issue and you know it in your heart of hearts. :tear:

 

The bottom line is that there is no common ground on murder. If we were talking about people murdering their 13 year old children, no one would bring up this common ground stuff.

Either you believe abortion is murder or you don't. If you don't believe that then you can talk common ground all you want...and all you'll be doing is making excuses for the sin in your heart.

 

Since this thread is now on page 4, it is closed per forum rules.

LE