"The Great Global Warming Swindle"

Don't we all wish humans had had the knowledge, perhaps long before Ionia, to know we should keep those glaciers from melting? We would not have inhabited Scandavia, Siberia, the Great Lakes area, the Rockies north of present New Mexico, maybe not even Britain.

 

I saw "The Great Global Warming Swindle" on TV last night and it was very, very good.

http://www.channel4.com/science/mic...rming_swindle/index.html?intcmp=homepage_box3

You can download it and watch it for about 99p or $1.50. It has some good, hard science with solid political explanations for why madness has become mainstream.

I would encourage you to have a look and even try and watch it.

 

It can be viewed on Google Video now.

 

Unfortunately Global warming will be the basis upon
which future stuff will be distrubuted in the world.
If you insist on saying 'no Global Warmin' - you
won't get your share of stuff.

Sadly, 98% of all the 38 Million Christian martyrs
were killed for POLITICAL reasons.
Please don't bet your life on there being no Global
Warming. Thank you.

BTW, politics = the manner and form of determining who
gets what stuff.

 

I'd like to see Africans getting a big share of their own stuff.

 

Is this not-so-subtly disguised or 'cloaked' 'crack' really necessary?

Ed

 

Hi, Ed. In poncho's defense, if you watch the video on Google that poncho linked to, you will see his comment was not intended as a 'cloaked crack.' It mentions big corporations hindering African economic development.

 

Thanks LE. I think it's sad to see so many people going without stuff we take for granted everyday like clean water and electricity in a place that has so much in the way of natural resources. That's all I was trying to say.

 

Why do "we" have to create their industry, aren't Africans capable of doing that themselves?

How is Africa suppose to industrialize if they aren't allowed to use their coal and oil to produce electricity?

 

Then I apologize. I did not watch the video. The wording that was used without 'introduction', could have still been improved, however, IMO.

Ed

 

I thought the video itself would be introduction enough. After taking a second look at what I posted I can see how someone might think I was making a derogatory remark, sorry for any confusion. I've been trying to refine my wordsmithing skills since becoming a member of BB without much success I'm afraid. :type:

 

Okay here's where I usually get into trouble, but I'm sorta used to it now so...

I feel there are things that need to be taken into account here that never seem to be. We look at issues like global warming as a single issue unrelated to any other but it isn't. IMHO it is just one part of a much larger issue. Based mostly on UN mandates like Agenda 21, Sustainable Development, the Earth Charter, population control, public private partnerships, the Nature Conservatory, the North American Union, Free Trade, etc. in a nutshell we're talking about the road to global governance here.

To my way of thinking the scarey tactics being used to forward the idea of global warming is aimed at bringing the world to a global consensus. That being the need for global taxation. Naw, it's probably just another coincidence that the idea of a "carbon tax" that just happens to be a global tax is being tossed around in the middle of the GW debate. So nevermind. :smilewinkgrin:

 

I tend to look at it different.
Global Warming is a political debate about who gets what.
If we don't participate in the debate
and if the Lord taries, we won't get
our share - if we opt out arguing "no it ain't", we loose our
share. If the Lord taries, your grandchildren may go
barefooted and wach TV in the dark. (Gotta watch TV, it
is the main ego suppression drug & global government
replaces the family orientation /formerly known as brain
washing/ tool.)

 

Most of the folks that support these 'programs' seem to have another thing in common, the idea that man is a parasite ruining the earth and the people at the top of these global scams (the elite) all seem to think in Malthusian terms about the poor or 'underclasses'.

I don't see how you look at it is that much different than the way I do Ed. It is a political debate about who gets what. In this case the underclasses will get less 'stuff' because they/we aren't as important or as smart as the global elite, thinking in Malthusian terms...the poor or underclasses don't deserve as much because they/we are mostly just useless eaters ruining the earth and the elite have a natural right to rule over us as we are no more to their way of thinking than cattle.

 

Exactly. I feel that in order to understand what's really going with all these 'issues' is to stop looking at them as seperate issues and start looking at them as the one big agenda to bring about the one world government and religion that it is.