On this board in the last few days have been threads that discuss the "worldiness" of certain activities. Belly button rings, cuss words and the like (though we could throw tobacco use, card playing and dancing into the ring as well.).
Of course, being the BB, we have had several different opinions offered on each individual subject. I'd like to examine the criteria that one uses in deciding if a certain activity meets the definition of "worldly".
I'd also like to examine the more abstract idea of if "_____" is considered worldly for me, it must by definition be worldly for you. Is this always the case?
And as always here lately I might be a while in getting back to this thread so ya'll feel free to argue among yourselves.
Who gets to decide?
Discussion in 'General Baptist Discussions' started by menageriekeeper, Jul 26, 2009.
Page 1 of 2
-
-
Interesting post MK.
Worldliness is an attitude of the heart that often manifests itself in physical things.
often times it is a matter of conforming to the styles of the day that some people have a problem with.
If baggy jeans are in style, better wear tight ones.
If tight jeans are in style, better wear baggy ones.
That pharisaical mindset is, I believe worldly.
Placing a primary emphasis on what it "worldly" on the outward man is itself worldly.
If the Bible does not condemn an action then the action is then not wrong.
Period.
Now there may be heart problems, like a girl who wants to get a particular piercing to attract improper attention to herself. But the sin and worldliness is in her desires not in the actual action.
By the way, according to the Amish, we are worldly for being on this web forum :) -
If we all werent so "worldly" we would be using horses and buggy's. (Amish or the Shakers...maybe both)
btw, I dont want anyone to misunderstand. I have tremendous respect for both of those groups. -
They both have replaced the death of our savior with their own form of works-righteousness.
ON a personal level, they tend to be nice people as far as I have met but respect for their beliefs? None. -
Alive, that is a good quote by Dr White on your signature line.
I should also add that I do have a level of respect on a secular level for the amish. A secular respect for their work ethic. I would not hesitate to hire one for certain jobs but I was talking about respecting their views of worldliness. -
Of course, I totally disagree with their doctrine.
Back to the augment - Mormons will not drink soda pop or coffee because they have caffeine, which is a drug. So are we Baptists sinning because we partake of (non-prescription) drugs?
Salty
PS M Keeper - I think it is a sin not to stay around for an arugment :laugh: :smilewinkgrin: -
Worldliness is the state of having an affection for things on the earth. (Col. 3:1-2).
-
I said I was coming back, just not for a while! :D Can't help that real life means I must limit my computer time occasionally.
Back to my own OP. I find it funny/strange/odd that a word that is used by many to limit the behavior of others is actually only used once in this context within the KJV(Titus 2:12). Surely if worldliness was such a danger to Christains God would have brought it up more often?
Titus did place this particular adjective in the middle of his word on how to behave, but the overall context of the piece is that a Christian should have self control and integrity. With that definition in mind how then can we condemn one another for allowing a belly button ring? Where is the lack of self control? Where is the lack of integrity (well unless you fail to pay for either the ring or the peircing)?
I believe that through the years our idea of what "worldly" actually means has taken on a meaning that Titus didn't intend.
I also find it odd that those who shout "worldly!" the most often have yet to show themselves on this thread. I wonder where they are? ;) -
-
1John 2:15 Love not the world, neither the things that are in the world. If any man love the world, the love of the Father is not in him.
That should be clear to all and the churches are falling more in love with the world every day. -
Aaron's scripture first: Notice what Paul says to put to death--sexual immorality, impurity, lust, evil desires, greed (which is idolatry). And wait, he goes further--anger, rage, malice, slander, abusive language, do not lie to one another.
Now based on this definition of the word worldly, we can say that "sugar coated cuss words" might be abusive, but really I think we are stretching the point in most cases where such words are an expression of pain rather than a reaction to something another person said or did. Even then, the cursing wouldn't be worldly as much as it would break our commandment to love one another. (which is reiterated at the end of Colossians 3)
You certainly can't apply this to the belly button ring, playing cards, dancing etc.
Let's pass on to another subject. Making money is the world's priority at the moment, their "idol" so to speak. Should we therefore eschew a good paycheck? Should we fail to provide ourselves with enough retirement money so we can travel in our older years or settle in Florida or fund whatever retirement plans we decide on? Should we tell our children that a college education is worldliness because they will be exposed to ideas that we as Christians don't agree with and anyway, going to college in order to make an above average paycheck is something the world is concerned with?
Where do we draw the line? -
For some, making money is worldly. Making money is their idol. That is a worldly thing.
So in a sense it is worldly for some but not for others.
But for all people, the money itself is not the evil, it is the love of it. It is the worship of those things.
As Piper has said, it is elevating gifts above giver.
But that is why it is dangerous to categorize things are being worldly rather that attitudes and motives. -
Old Regular...
But the point of the topic heading, and that was brought up early in this thread is.....what is "wordly"?
To some christian groups like the Amish, having a TV, using electricity, and driving cars rather than horses and buggys is being in violation of the biblical admonition regarding "worldliness".
Do you agree with them? If not, can you prove they are wrong? -
Marcia,
Thanks for the info. I didnt know that about the Shakers. What I was getting at is just "the Amish and other groups like them."
I respect them because of their work ethic, simple lifestyles, honesty, peacefull non-violent attitude, etc. -
-
Rather than asking ourselves about what is wrong with something, maybe we should be asking ourselves about what is right with it.
-
Would looking at things from the positive really make things easier to decide? -
-
-
Aaron, can you demonstrate how a belly-button ring might be a stumbling block to a new Christian?
On the same lines can you demonstrate that vanity is "worldly"? (and go ahead and give us a definiton of vanity while you are responding please)
Because I find both the issue of "worldliness" and "vanity" to be issues of attitude and not just of action. Putting on cosmetics to hide an ugly scar, might simply be necessary in order to stop unwanted attention. At the same time, (on a different person) cosmetics might be used TO draw attention. Are the cosmetics at fault? Or is it the attitude of the person who is wearing them?
Page 1 of 2