Bingo! And a fine job she did with those kids.That was Mrs. Wesley, mother of John and Charles Wesley.
Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
Bingo! And a fine job she did with those kids.That was Mrs. Wesley, mother of John and Charles Wesley.
It does no good to tell the little ones the reasons why. They aren't mentally capable of understanding it yet. You simply let them know the standards. Then when they're old enough to mentally process things, you take them through the reasons, and let them go through the thinking process on their own. Then when they are older still, you let them have their own standards without criticizing them--as long as they have carefully thought things through.Gina,
It is wonderful that they are teaching their children not to look at immodestly dressed women. But if that is the only thing they are being told and they are not being told who it was that says this, it is doing nothing for that child at all but teaching him good moral.
I am reminded of the movie, "Time Changer" where a young boy was told it was wrong to steal marbles. He was not told why it was wrong. It was explained later that you can clean up a persons morals and that person can be the kindest person on earth. But if you teach good morals without Jesus Christ, your teaching is in vain.
They must have lived in West Virgina :smilewinkgrin:"BECAUSE SHE IS YOUR COUSIN, THAT'S WHY."
True story.
I disagree, John. Born in October 1997, Little Joy Anna was 12 or 13 in that video. Quite old enough to understand.It does no good to tell the little ones the reasons why. They aren't mentally capable of understanding it yet. You simply let them know the standards. Then when they're old enough to mentally process things, you take them through the reasons, and let them go through the thinking process on their own. Then when they are older still, you let them have their own standards without criticizing them--as long as they have carefully thought things through.
I disagree, John. Born in October 1997, Little Joy Anna was 12 or 13 in that video. Quite old enough to understand.
Yes, I agree - age would make a big difference
They must have lived in West Virgina :smilewinkgrin:
Girls are just as capable of lusting as boys are, yet it is the boys who are told it is wrong to look.
Sorry, I know nothing about the show and the ages of the kids. I assumed the child was small. I'd say 12 or 13 is when they can start understanding the standards. So maybe that is what they are doing now with Joy Anna, I don't know.I disagree, John. Born in October 1997, Little Joy Anna was 12 or 13 in that video. Quite old enough to understand.
Gina,
It is wonderful that they are teaching their children not to look at immodestly dressed women. But if that is the only thing they are being told and they are not being told who it was that says this, it is doing nothing for that child at all but teaching him good moral.
I am reminded of the movie, "Time Changer" where a young boy was told it was wrong to steal marbles. He was not told why it was wrong. It was explained later that you can clean up a persons morals and that person can be the kindest person on earth. But if you teach good morals without Jesus Christ, your teaching is in vain.
I believe many of your observations are valid, but aren't these families very similar to families we read about in the scriptures? Didn't Abraham send a servant to his country and his kindred to find a wife for Isaac?What I see in famililes like the Duggars and these I mentioned is that instead of pervading society with the message of the Gospel, they preserve themselves inside their own little bubble. I know I will get blasted for this, but from MY EXPERIENCES in MY CORNER OF THE WORLD (disclaimer), fundamentalism turns off non-believers. "And that's all I got to say about that."
:saint:
I know little about the Dugger family and any efforts they might make to reach the world, but you're generalizing about fundamentalists, and you are mistaken.What I see in famililes like the Duggars and these I mentioned is that instead of pervading society with the message of the Gospel, they preserve themselves inside their own little bubble.
Well said!I believe many of your observations are valid, but aren't these families very similar to families we read about in the scriptures? Didn't Abraham send a servant to his country and his kindred to find a wife for Isaac?
Not saying we should marry kin, just pointing out how important family is shown in the scriptures.
In Bible days, or even two hundred years ago these families would have been very normal. It is not that they have changed, the world has changed.
I disagee about these families not spreading the gospel, the children often go into ministry.
So, they are strange, but is that bad? Most are good, hardworking, and God fearing people.
And of course the world hates them, the more godly you are, the more the world will hate you.
What I see in famililes like the Duggars and these I mentioned is that instead of pervading society with the message of the Gospel, they preserve themselves inside their own little bubble.
The rule seems sexist. I mean, it is obvious that the girls can look at any man walking down the street and not have to hear "Nike" and "All Gone."
Girls are just as capable of lusting as boys are, yet it is the boys who are told it is wrong to look.