Brother Yelsew,
ME: Does every man have the exact same nature spiritually?
YOUR ANSWER: Every man has the same propensity to sin!
ME: You didnt answer my question. I didnt ask you about man's propensity to sin. AGAIN I ask, does every man have the exact same nature before becoming born again?
Take care,
Brother Joe
NUTS FOR ARMINIANS TO CRACK
Discussion in '2004 Archive' started by BrotherJoe, Mar 22, 2004.
Page 9 of 12
-
-
-
It is the Broken FAITH and the resulting fractured Trust among Brothers of the faith, that causes Denominationalism, Doctrinal differences, Factions in the Body of Christ, etc.
It is Broken faith between man and God that results in man facing the second death!
If you cannot see how that works then you simply are not looking! It happens all the time, in virtually every aspect of the FAITH of Christianity, and in nearly every aspect of Society in general. Hence we have "politics". Hence we have RELIGIONS. Hence we have Wars!
And YES, it is the same principle in each individual human being.
Now to set the record straight! CONTEXT IS EVERYTHING -
Joe,
I see your point. And I think that is a good answer. But what is it about the child that the Holy Spirit makes us "like"? Even if you give the Holy Spirit the "credit" for making us like a child that still doesn't answer the question of what was in a child that God wants us to be like. Make sense? -
Bro. Joe, you accused Skandelon thusly,
*** There shall be no name calling or flaming permitted on the BB. Edited by Barnabas, BB Administrator ***
[ March 28, 2004, 10:35 PM: Message edited by: Barnabas ] -
Then Bro. Dallas postedDear Brother Yelsew2,
Concerning that which was originally given to all created beings for meat.
Beginning with Genesis 1.27 (the creation of man and woman).
So God created man in his own image, in the image of God created he him; male and female created he them.
28 And God blessed them, and God said unto them, Be fruitful, and multiply, and replenish the earth, and subdue it: and have dominion over the fish of the sea, and over the fowl of the air, and over every living thing that moveth upon the earth.
29 And God said, Behold, I have given you every herb bearing seed, which is upon the face of all the earth, and every tree yielding seed; to you it shall be for meat.
30 And to every beast of the earth, and to every fowl of the air, and to every thing that creepeth upon the earth, wherein there is life, I have given every green herb for meat: and it was so.
31 And God saw every thing that he had made, and, behold, it was very good. And the evening and the morning were the sixth day.Click to expand...Scriptural Usage of “ALL”
“Who gave himself a ransom for all, to be testified in due time.” 1 Timothy 2.6
The first error we might fall into here is assuming this passage may be able to stand alone. There is no scripture that can properly stand alone, as all is written in context of other scripture then, truly all must draw from that which is in immediate context, and also that which may be distant from its context but topically related. The point is, scripture is the best interpreter of scripture. And even this is impossible apart from approaching its study with a Spiritual attitude. We should always approach scripture from the standpoint of Philippians 2.5: Let this mind be in you, which was also in Christ Jesus: and this should always produce in us that humility which is described of Christ in verses 6 & 7. Who being in the form of God, thought it not robbery to be equal with God: But made himself of no reputation, and took upon him the form of a servant, and was made in the likeness of men: This scripture at 1 Timothy 2.6 is bound to the context of 1 Timothy, first: Paul an apostle of Jesus Christ by the commandment of God our Saviour, and Lord Jesus Christ, which is our hope. (Note: ‘which is’ is added to strengthen, but is not needed to clarify ‘our hope.’) That hope is thus established in Christ alone, and that hope has been made ours. The Scripture does not say He is the hope of the world. But that He is our hope, then it follows the epistle is addressing those who have found Christ to be their hope, it cannot be speaking to ‘all’ others, simply because not all men have found hope in Christ. If we assume the verse at 2.6 means to have in view “all” mankind, then we do a terrible damage to scripture which can only be repaired by the Holy Spirit. What about those of the day of Noah who, though they were warned of the wrath to come found themselves the object of the wrath of God, what about the rich man who lifted his eyes from hell and saw Lazarus comforted in the bosom of Abraham? Would ‘all’ not have included this man? To force upon scripture the interpretation that “all” does mean everyone is a distortion of scripture, which cannot be contained in the damage which is done to scripture. First, it assumes the Bible is a lie. It assumes that all who have found themselves lost and condemned without Christ may somehow gain that position, or else all of scripture can be brought into question as to its truthfulness. In fact, if only the rich man in the story of Lazarus were to be the only one condemned to hell, still the word “all” could not be stretched to mean the whole of mankind. First we have at Chapter 2.6: Who gave himself a ransom for all… Here ‘all’ is the Greek pas and according to Vine’s it means “all” when used without an article it means ‘every kind or variety’. (Isaiah 53.11 & 12; Revelation 5.9) The only time this word is used to mean collectively all, as in the whole is when used before proper names, such as countries, nations, cities, or collective terms such as Israel, or when it is use with the article, then it means the whole of one object. (Rom. 11.26; Is. 59.20; where even the usage of all is limited by scripture: Isaiah 59.20: “And the Redeemer shall come to Zion, and unto them that turn from transgression in Jacob saith the Lord”. This likewise limits Romans 11.26: “And so all Israel shall be saved: as it is written, There shall come out of Sion a Deliverer, and shall turn away ungodliness in Jacob:” [This scripture is also limited by Romans 9.6-8]. Romans 11.32 says: “For God hath concluded them all in unbelief, that he might have mercy upon all.” This signifies the longsuffering of God upon all ungodliness in order that the election will stand. In times past men died under the Law without mercy, (Romans 9.15-18; Hebrews 10.28). Thus the mercy of God is extended unto all mankind; this is common grace; but the mercy of God extending to saving Grace is witnessed in Romans 11.31-32. Note in verse 30 Paul is speaking to believers in Rome and therefore to believers in our present day: “For as ye in times past have not believed God, yet have now obtained mercy through their unbelief: then verse 31: “Even so have these also now not believed, that through your mercy they also may obtain mercy.” Here it is not be understood ‘your mercy’ that is in view toward the unbelieving Jews whereby they may ‘obtain mercy’ but rather the indwelling of the Holy Spirit in believers and the church by which they are moved to supplications, prayers, intercessions and giving of thanks according to Romans 8.26& 27. We see here a common mercy, or common grace that is extended to all people; but verse 32 limits the idea to the purposes of God, (God hath concluded them all in unbelief, that he might have mercy upon all) speaking to “Those who are Israelites; to whom pertaineth the adoption, and the glory, and the covenants, and the giving of the law, and the service of God, and the promises; (Romans 9.4). In order that the mercy be extended universally, in the common grace of God and that the election may stand that in ‘due season’ the testimony will be born in those that are quickened and then called (2 Thessalonnians 2.13-14). All is also used in this way when used without a noun because it becomes a pronoun, and signifies either everyone, or anyone. (Note these words are not inclusive, but really rather particular, if not singular in their meaning). To show the meaning of all as it is given here at verse 6 we see the first clause of the passage has a qualifier, “…to be testified in due time.” This qualifier is limiting the word all to mean only those to whom the truth is testified to also in accordance to Scripture (Romans 8.16 & Galatians 3.8; 4.6). Instead of becoming a word with a universal meaning “all” becomes a limited word and particular to those who possess the call of God to eternal life. Had the Holy Spirit been saying here that Christ had given himself for all the construction would have been: Who gave himself a ransom for all. The statement would have been complete in itself and the qualifying ‘to be testified in due time’ would have been left off. But, even with this statement, the fact that not all men find hope in Christ limits the ability of ‘all’ being universal or unlimited. Rather than finding a universal theology conducive to Arminianism here at verse 6, the truth taught is that of the particular limited atonement (that of the elect alone for which Christ died). For it is only those who the truth of the ransom (with verse 4) is testified to (in due time), these are they that enjoy the benefits of the ransom.Click to expand...
So does "every" really mean ALL? Does "ALL" really mean ALL?
Have I stated your position accurately Bro. Dallas? -
Dear Brother Yelsew2,
I stated concerning the 'division' of the earth that I was not dogmatic on it. I do believe it. I believe as well that the close proximity to the confusion of tongues renders this a non-isolated event.
Regarding the 'herb' question, I also did not limit my discussion of that to the Genesis account and if you will read what I wrote you will find that Romans 8 certainly teaches that the whole of creation will certainly be redeemed. This idea is also found in one of the prophets, Isaiah I think speaking of the future kingdom age, and is further supported in Revelation as the Bible discusses the new earth, then we also hear Peter's voice through inspiration added speaking of the renovation of the present earth.
No, dear Brother, I am not drawing either belief from an isolated scriptural occurrence, nor am I doubting the inspiration of any portion of the word of God.
You must certainly recognize now that God did call all of his creation very good, but that the sequence of scripture places this at the very least a full day prior to the fall of man.
In that fall, the whole nature of the creation of God has been plunged into depravity. Upheld in the natural laws only by the commong grace and mercy of God.
In the discussion of all, the qualifier is that to whom these things are testified in due time; that is in their season. This, if a word study is completed will be seen to be the time appointed, thus, all the elect will be provided a testimony of thier position in Christ in their appointed time, all without fail shall receive this testimony, in spite of me and you. :eek:
Again, concerning the supposed 'ommission' of the so called 'new worlds' you must certainly recognize that every ancient civilization possesses an account of a worldwide 'flood' which destroyed mankind. IN China, the particular account speaks of one man being preserved in a boat, instead of the biblical account. Only this one man is similar to the son of heaven, he establishes the Chinese peoples and brings forth his kinsmen. Much of world history attests to the fact that the sons of Noah understood the promises of God as taught obviously to them from their earthly father, and that varying versions of it has been found in civilizations around the world is a further testimony to a very real possibility that all mankind not only came from the sons of Noah as the Biblical account provides, but that they were once free to roam over the entire mass of land, all the 'waters' being gathered together into one place. Thus, there is no 'continent' that you have listed that is left to be omitted from the word of God, for at the first, there was but one land mass as there was but one language and that all people come from one single source, fallen depraved Adam (which is the Hebrew word for both 'earth' and man). Therefore his name is not limited to himself alone but immediately engulfs the whole of the human race, even as scripture bears witness I should say.
Bro. Dallas Eaton -
Granted the scriptures do reveal much, and like you I do not base any particular believe that I have on only one scripture, but you haven't given me the credibility that you demand for youself. Hence strong words appear on the page.
One day when you see what scriptures reveal about man and about the fall, and about man's present condition, and what is truly needed "IN MAN" for salvation you will remember these discussions, as I have the discussions that I participated in as my life progressed and my spiritual maturity grew, and though you will not remember my name, as the concepts reveal themselves to you, you will remember somewhere in your past they were presented by someone to you. -
I do not know your name...I mean is it Yelsew, or Yelsew2???? :D
Dear Brother, I was raised by loving parents and other family who raised me in the same teaching you now believe. Because I have finally taken to study of the Bible than to rely upon their 'fears' for my source, I have learned better than to believe the things they have taught me in my youth.
I do believe it is consistent to teach, and receive as truth, that man if able to 'choose' to believe in Christ is also able to 'choose' to discontinue in that belief.
But, the scriptures do not teach that, Christ himself called this gift eternal life, now it is either eternal or it is not; it is either a gift or it is not, if either one, even the 'eternal' nature of life can be possibly lost, then there is no truth to found anywhere, not even in the whole or portions of scripture.
If one phrase of it can be denied, the whole of it must be thrown out.
God Bless
Bro. Dallas -
Do you expect to get out of this life alive?
No, it is appointed unto man ONCE to die. Well what about eternal life?
We who believe in Jesus Christ must die so that we can pass from death into life everlasting. Those who don't die and then the judgment!
No I don't agree with your last statement! That is throwing the baby out with the bathwater. The converse of which is keeping the baby in the bathwater all the time. It does not work either way!
You hold fast to that which is true! -
Brother Skandelon,
YOU:I see your point. And I think that is a good answer. But what is it about the child that the Holy Spirit makes us "like"? Even if you give the Holy Spirit the "credit" for making us like a child that still doesn't answer the question of what was in a child that God wants us to be like. Make sense?
ME: Why I think God said we have to "become like a child" is exactly the same reason he says we have to be "born again" to enter the kingdom. We know both are impossible with man and can only be accomplished by God alone. Other analogies of our salvation are similar such as the comparison of us being resurrected, can man raise the dead ? We are also referred to as being new creatures, a new creation. Did Man play an active role in creation? God is the only creator. Likewise with the birth/child analogy, we had no choice in being born the first time so it is the 2nd time. I guess we will have to agree to disagree brother Skandelon.
God bless and have a good worship service tomorrow!
Brother Joe -
Brother Yelsew,
YOU: Verse 14-18 is Paul giving warning to Timothy about FALSE TEACHERS (of which, you are one).
ME: Im sorry you have had to resort to name calling on this forum. You have done it on several other occasions to others as well. Your the only one on here that I have seen who resorts to such tactics. Nevertheless, they called our Lord names and he himself rightly said, "It is enough for the disciple that he be as his master, and the servant as his lord. If they have called the master of the house Beelzebub, how much more shall they call them of his household?" (Matthew 10:25)
God bless you .
Brother Joe -
Brother Yelsew2,
YOU:Hipocrit!
ME: I did not omit words in the middle of the verse like the other poster did acidently. I put the entire verse. Here it is again. "If we believe not, yet he abideth faithful: he cannot deny himself" (2 Tim 2:13) Go back and read that post by me again if you desire.
Not putting the verse prior to that verse is not misquoting scripture! It isnt the same as excluding words in the middle of a verse.
Saved by grace,
Brother Joe -
Originally posted by Yelsew2:
Do you expect to get out of this life alive?
No, it is appointed unto man ONCE to die. Well what about eternal life?
We who believe in Jesus Christ must die so that we can pass from death into life everlasting. Those who don't die and then the judgment!
No I don't agree with your last statement! That is throwing the baby out with the bathwater. The converse of which is keeping the baby in the bathwater all the time. It does not work either way!
You hold fast to that which is true!Click to expand...
I fear that your difficulty remains a 'veil' of flesh over your eyes. you have looked upon the mount, you have heard the terrible voice of God and you are bidding Moses to go between you and He.
According to scripture we know we have passed from death unto life because we love the brethren.
This is speaking of our passing from previous spiritual death to current and eternal spiritual life. This is also supported with scriptures that promise the indwelling of the Holy Spirit, the bearing witness by that Spirit with our spirit that we are the children of God.
That is our seal, our earnest that we shall be resurrected by the same Spirit of holiness through Christ was (Romans 1.4).
We are not awaiting a future time for God to declare we had no faith. If in this world only we had hope, we would be of all men most miserable (paraphrase).
May God Bless
Bro. Dallas Eaton -
Brothers,
I am going out of town this week and doubt I will be able to post. Please keep me in your prayers. I have enjoyed discussing scriptures with everyone on here and believe everyone has something they can teach one another.
God bless,
Brother Joe -
ME: Im sorry you have had to resort to name calling on this forum. You have done it on several other occasions to others as well. Your the only one on here that I have seen who resorts to such tactics. Nevertheless, they called our Lord names and he himself rightly said, "It is enough for the disciple that he be as his master, and the servant as his lord. If they have called the master of the house Beelzebub, how much more shall they call them of his household?" (Matthew 10:25)
God bless you .Click to expand...YOU:Hypocrite!
ME: I did not omit words in the middle of the verse like the other poster did acidently. I put the entire verse. Here it is again. "If we believe not, yet he abideth faithful: he cannot deny himself" (2 Tim 2:13) Go back and read that post by me again if you desire.
Not putting the verse prior to that verse is not misquoting scripture! It isnt the same as excluding words in the middle of a verse.
Saved by grace,
Brother JoeClick to expand...
2 Timothy 2:11-13. Here is a saying that you can rely on: If we have died with him, then we shall live with him. If we persevere, then we shall reign with him. If we disown him, then he will disown us. If we are faithless, he is faithful still, for he cannot disown his own self.Click to expand... -
Brother Yelsew,
YOU:Hipocrit! You've called me everything but Christian! You've made every attempt to pigeon-hole me into some category or another, you call my beliefs names and that is exactly the same as calling me names! You do exactly what you've found fault with in others, that is is being hypocritical, that is why I called you a Hypocrite!
ME: I believe your saved and on your way to heaven. Im sorry if you feel I havent treated you kindly.
YOU: quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2 Timothy 2:11-13. Here is a saying that you can rely on: If we have died with him, then we shall live with him. If we persevere, then we shall reign with him. If we disown him, then he will disown us. If we are faithless, he is faithful still, for he cannot disown his own self."
This scripture kind of knocks the wind out of "once-saved-always-saved". Even Paul acknowledges that is it possible for us to disown the Christ...and he does not exempt "the elect"!
ME: This scripture does not "knock the wind out of once saved always saved. I noticed your translation states, "if we disown him, then he will disown us." However, the KJV renders it, "if we deny him, he also will deny us." How can this knock the wind out of once saved always saved when the apostle Peter denied Jesus 3 times yet we assuredly know he is in heaven. The following passage knocks the wind out of the possibility of the elect not persevering until the end:
"And we know that all things work together for good to them that love God, to them who are the called according to his purpose.
29 For whom he did foreknow, he also did predestinate to be conformed to the image of his Son, that he might be the firstborn among many brethren.
30 Moreover whom he did predestinate, them he also called: and whom he called, them he also justified: and whom he justified, them he also glorified.
31 What shall we then say to these things? If God be for us, who can be against us?
32 He that spared not his own Son, but delivered him up for us all, how shall he not with him also freely give us all things?
33 Who shall lay any thing to the charge of God's elect? It is God that justifieth.
34 Who is he that condemneth? It is Christ that died, yea rather, that is risen again, who is even at the right hand of God, who also maketh intercession for us.
35 Who shall separate us from the love of Christ? shall tribulation, or distress, or persecution, or famine, or nakedness, or peril, or sword?
36 As it is written, For thy sake we are killed all the day long; we are accounted as sheep for the slaughter.
37 Nay, in all these things we are more than conquerors through him that loved us.
38 For I am persuaded, that neither death, nor life, nor angels, nor principalities, nor powers, nor things present, nor things to come,
39 Nor height, nor depth, nor any other creature, shall be able to separate us from the love of God, which is in Christ Jesus our Lord." (Romans 8:28-39)
Brother Yelsew, verse 38 states "THINGS TO COME" CANNOT seperate me from the love of God. Wouldnt this include any future unfaithfulness on my part? Further, verse 30 says "NO CREATURE" will SEPERATE me from the love of God, wouldnt this include myself? If the answer to those two questions are yes, then it is proven it is impossible for a believer to lose his salvation. Christ is both the "author and FINISHER Of our faith." (hebrews 12:2) "Being confident of this very thing, that he which hath begun a good work in you will perform it until the day of Jesus Christ:" (Phillipians 1:6), and finally "All that the Father giveth me shall come to me..."(john 6:37). When God saves he finishes the job.
Saved by grace,
Brother Joe -
Excellent post Brother Joe
-
ME: This scripture does not "knock the wind out of once saved always saved. I noticed your translation states, "if we disown him, then he will disown us." However, the KJV renders it, "if we deny him, he also will deny us." How can this knock the wind out of once saved always saved when the apostle Peter denied Jesus 3 times yet we assuredly know he is in heaven. The following passage knocks the wind out of the possibility of the elect not persevering until the end:Click to expand...disown, v.t.
to refuse to acknowledge as belonging or pertaining to oneself; deny the ownership of or responsibility for; repudiate; renounce: to disown one's heirs; to disown a published statement.
--Syn. disclaim, disavow, reject, abjure.
deny, v.t., -nied, -ny·ing.
1. to state that (something declared or believed to be true) is not true: to deny an accusation.
2. to refuse to agree or accede to: to deny a petition.
3. to withhold the possession, use, or enjoyment of: to deny access to secret information.
4. to withhold something from, or refuse to grant a request of: to deny a beggar.
5. to refuse to recognize or acknowledge; disown; disavow; repudiate: to deny one's gods.
6. to withhold (someone) from accessibility to a visitor: The secretary denied his employer to all those without appointments.
7. Obs. to refuse to take or accept.
8. deny oneself, to refrain from satisfying one's desires or needs; practice self-denial.
--denyingly, adv.
--Syn.1. dispute, controvert, oppose, gainsay. DENY, CONTRADICT both imply objecting to or arguing against something. To DENY is to say that something is not true: to deny an allegation. To CONTRADICT is to declare that the contrary is true: to contradict a statement. 5. renounce, abjure.
—Ant.1. admit, accept. 3. allow.Click to expand...
Brother Yelsew, verse 38 states "THINGS TO COME" CANNOT seperate me from the love of God. Wouldnt this include any future unfaithfulness on my part? Further, verse 30 says "NO CREATURE" will SEPERATE me from the love of God, wouldnt this include myself? If the answer to those two questions are yes, then it is proven it is impossible for a believer to lose his salvation. Christ is both the "author and FINISHER Of our faith." (hebrews 12:2) "Being confident of this very thing, that he which hath begun a good work in you will perform it until the day of Jesus Christ:" (Phillipians 1:6), and finally "All that the Father giveth me shall come to me..."(john 6:37). When God saves he finishes the job.Click to expand... -
Originally posted by BrotherJoe:
Brother Skandelon,
YOU:I see your point. And I think that is a good answer. But what is it about the child that the Holy Spirit makes us "like"? Even if you give the Holy Spirit the "credit" for making us like a child that still doesn't answer the question of what was in a child that God wants us to be like. Make sense?
ME: Why I think God said we have to "become like a child" is exactly the same reason he says we have to be "born again" to enter the kingdom. We know both are impossible with man and can only be accomplished by God alone. Other analogies of our salvation are similar such as the comparison of us being resurrected, can man raise the dead ? We are also referred to as being new creatures, a new creation. Did Man play an active role in creation? God is the only creator. Likewise with the birth/child analogy, we had no choice in being born the first time so it is the 2nd time. I guess we will have to agree to disagree brother Skandelon.Click to expand...
Page 9 of 12