What Happened To mankind in the fall of Adam ?

No, it is not. Orthodox Christianity holds that we all sin, that sin is birthed when temptation and the desires of the flesh conceive (James 1). The idea that Jesus came with a nature different from ours, that our illness, suffering, and physical mortality was foreign to Christ was denounced as unorthodox centuries ago.

Christ was born with and into the same humanity you and I share, yet without sin.

 

Exactly. Christ's qualification as our High Priest is dependent on him being "one of us".

 

Nowhere does Scripture state our nature itself is sinful.

It is with this hypothetical nature that you stray from the Bible in your Christlogy. You have decided our nature is sinful therefore Christ was not truly "flesh" (as we are). You have decided that since death and sickness came with the Fall Jesus was not subject to illness and death as we are.

This is NOT orthodox thinking. 8n fact, your view of Christ and this "third" nature was deemed heresy centuries ago.

Christ shared in our "infirmities", he was tempted in all points as we are, yet without sin.

 

Scripture doesn't.

The idea that Jesus had a "different kind" of nature, one that is foreign to mankind, is simply heresy. The idea that Jesus came in the flesh, but a kind of flesh that couldn't suffer the illnesses, pains, and natural death that is common to man is heresy. NOTHING you say can change that fact.

The reason earlier Christians declared your view heresy is because it denies biblical redemption on the grounds of the Incarnation. It, in fact, redefines the incarnation.

 

like I said - old heresy repackaged.

Odd. My dog got sick and we had him put down last year (he was 17). Do dogs sin?

Anyway, for what sin do you believe Job suffered?

 

I wonder how many Reformed Baptists here believe that Jesus came in a "different flesh", a different human nature than is common to man. I wonder how many believe Jesus never got sick and would have lived eternally on this earth had he not been killed. I wonder how many believe Jesus did not share in our infirmity but instead was a different type of human.

I bet more rely on Scripture than you think.

 

All of the ones that are sticking to Scripture on the point. I know of very few today who hold the biological sin view of Christ's birth (and I'm including you).

 

No. It would mean that you are in the minority. Orthodox Christians denounced the notion of Jesus coming in a different "flesh" centuries ago. This is a superstition on your part - an old heresy.