I say different. He's a cussing idiot that has no place behind a pulpit!!!:thumbsup::jesus:
Don't you love when people are stuck in the past and don't allow repentance and change? I feel sorry for your pastor and those around you.
Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
I say different. He's a cussing idiot that has no place behind a pulpit!!!:thumbsup::jesus:
Don't you love when people are stuck in the past and don't allow repentance and change? I feel sorry for your pastor and those around you.
Absurd. not stepping down from the pulpit has no bearing in whether he continues to do it or not. One is not evidence of the other.
Absolutely! Mark Driscoll is a fantastic preacher and dead-on bible centered! I can't underetimate how fantastic he is! :thumbsup:Pastor Mark is a fine man, an excellent pastor, and profound expositor of God's Word. Shame on anyone who says differently.
Absolutely! Mark Driscoll is a fantastic preacher and dead-on bible centered! I can't underetimate how fantastic he is! :thumbsup:
Absolutely! Mark Driscoll is a fantastic preacher and dead-on bible centered! I can't underetimate how fantastic he is! :thumbsup:
Andy Stanley is part of the seeker movement? Bet that's news for like EVERYBODY.
I don't know the man that wrote this article, but this would be news to me also.:smilewinkgrin::godisgood:
Dead on Bible centered? So you believe it is a sin to abstain from the consumption of alcohol, as he does?
It certainly does show some bias IMO which would make me question much of what he wrote in that first article.
That's not what he said. He said that the way he was abstaining from alcohol was sinful (he was engaging in a legalism). He was referring to himself alone, and was not making a general statement about abstinence in general.Dead on Bible centered? So you believe it is a sin to abstain from the consumption of alcohol, as he does?
No, legalism referrs to making adherence to the law the standard for righteousness or salvation. For example, not allowing someone to work on the sabbath is legalistic, even though scripture commands believers to rest on the sabbath. Likewise, not allowing the consumption of alcohol can be considered legalistic, especially when it's used as a litmus test for determining a person's righteousness.Also, I always thought legalism was extra-biblical mandates...
While unusual, there's certainly nothing unscriptural about it.And I'm still waiting for justification of brew classes in church.
Potlucks don't honor Christ. Yet the word "Baptist" and "potluck" are practically synonymous.If something doesn't honor Christ then it doesn't belong in a Christ-centered Church.
No, legalism referrs to making adherence to the law the standard for righteousness or salvation. For example, not allowing someone to work on the sabbath is legalistic, even though scripture commands believers to rest on the sabbath. Likewise, not allowing the consumption of alcohol can be considered legalistic, especially when it's used as a litmus test for determining a person's righteousness.
While unusual, there's certainly nothing unscriptural about it.
Potlucks don't honor Christ. Yet the word "Baptist" and "potluck" are practically synonymous.
Then, by your definition, requiring abstinence as a matter of righteousness is legalism.There is none righteous, no not one. Legalism is extra-biblical mandates.
We're not talking about what is to be preached, that's a different topic. The question was about brewry class on church grounds. There's nothing unscriptural in and of itself about it.That is baloney. The bible is clear what is to be preached. You are just finding excuses for this guy.