Perhaps an illustration:
I have a toothache.
I go to the dentist.
Bad tooth.
I refuse treatment, because "I will not" allow the tooth to be treated.
Therefore, the tooth "CANNOT" be saved.
Perhaps you need to show from Scriptures that one CAN be redeemed without any prior work of the Scriptures and the Holy Spirit.
Because it is abundantly clear that you have rejected what I have shown, so it is your turn to prove what you hold as valid.
Would this be a fair statement?
Discussion in 'Calvinism & Arminianism Debate' started by saved and sure, Dec 15, 2017.
Page 6 of 7
-
-
-
saved and sure MemberSite Supporter
-
But ALL Scriptures are given....
So, unless you can attain understanding of the CONTEXT then you argue only from a extremely limited and distorted view.
Again, Romans 8, 9, 10.
That puts the matter of which you disagree with me into the perspective that encompasses the whole panorama. -
Understand WHY he cannot. He nature, in open rebellion against God, won't allow him. His pride won't allow him. -
-
saved and sure MemberSite Supporter
Whosoever means whosoever! It doesn't say the elect or the chosen or the predestined. -
saved and sure MemberSite Supporter
It appears clear that some on this thread jump to other scriptures when they cannot answer questions about a specific scripture.
-
After the fall, the destiny was not "hinged" but fixed. ALL have sinned - therefore ALL are destined.
Perhaps the failure is this matter called "time." Humankind live in a short span we call "time." But God does not. He dwells in eternity.
As He considers the events and happenings, He will use time as a tool, but He is not conformed to time.
This is why those who are unbelievers are "condemned already." The destiny is not "predetermined/pre-destined" but fixed already.
Using the example of an sailing vessel:
Pre-destined/ predetermined merely means that God in His own Sovereignty purposes some who were fitted for and destined to hell to be given new fittings and "pre-destined" instead for redemption.
In the arsenal of the Navy resides many (over a 1000 last I knew) vessels that are from previous use. They are not fitted for service, and may never be refitted for service. One day they will be taken and melted down or sunken to rot. However, occasionally a vessel is selected to be destined again for service (pre-destined) and refitted for that purpose. -
The question isn't from God's view, but from humankind vantage point.
All have sinned. All have rejected the truth, All have gone their own way. There is NOT as single humankind that is righteous.
Therefore, what prevents the "who-so-ever" from belief?
Can the "who-so-ever" of their own volition violate the principles of Scripture that declare belief is not based upon the "will of man" to of there own self will, believe?
What is present in that person to believe (again READ Romans 8 - 10). -
-
-
Have you actually re-read Romans 8, 9, 10 to gather wisdom as to the context of Romans 9?
If you have, you would see how very wrong your thinking is on what Paul is presenting.
Romans 8 begins by stating the deliverance found in Christ,"There is no condemnation ..."
Paul continues to show how that the deliverance also is coupled with ultimate victory and that nothing of this life or that of the future will separate the believer from deliverance.
Paul goes on to illustrate that principle.
Now, I have started you down the road, but just as in Pilgrim's Progress, the pilgrim had to walk he was not carried.
Do the work of attending to the Scripture of Romans 8, 9, 10. -
Regarding men's choices, men have "Free Moral Agency", but not "Free Will" (in the way that some imagine free will).
-
I have suggested this source more as I have grown less acute in my ability, because it takes every possible angle of "free agent" thinking that both the Scriptures and that which the philosophies of the world have to offer and shows the value.
Mind you it is not something that is an easy read. In fact, it will take many days to work through. It is possibly one of the most scholarly texts and frankly most have very little ability to handle this level of content. It is merely 184 pages long.
In our interaction, I would consider you capable, and even desirous to know the strengths and weaknesses. At least that is what I perceive.
So, here is a link and again, it is not an easy read, but what one might read at the graduate level to gain understanding of the topic.
There is an online "synopsis" of the work that culls it down to about 20 pages, but I'm not certain that it is that beneficial.
Anyway, give it a try.
If you gain victory in reading it, great. For the road is littered with those who had great intent to start and became too wearied in the journey. -
The very fact that you think it counters our position indicates you don't have a clue what you are talking about.
God, in this manner, loved the world (of mankind), that He gave His only begotten son, that anyone who believes in Him will not perish but have everlasting life.
Now, what part of that do you think we deny?
He loved the world: His sacrifice was sufficient for every person who ever lived or ever will live.
Whoever believes in Him. Every single person who believes the Gospel will be saved.
Not perish but have everlasting life. No person who is saved will ever be lost. -
Iconoclast Well-Known MemberSite Supporter
6 for God did so love the world, that His Son -- the only begotten -- He gave, that every one who is believing in him may not perish, but may have life age-during.
-
-
-
Revmitchell Well-Known MemberSite Supporter
The Calvinist version of John 3:16 is:
" God so loved the elect that He gave His only begotten Son; that as a result of being elected you will be regenerated so you can believe with no other option available to you. You will have everlasting life that is imposed on you after your nature is changed you can do nothing else."
Page 6 of 7